Full ET disclosure plan involves document dumps & whistleblowers coming forward

Written by Dr Michael Salla on . Posted in exopolitics activism, Secret Space Programs

Full ET disclosure involves document dumps

Secret space program whistleblower Corey Goode has revealed in detail the goal of an alliance of secret space programs concerning disclosure of extraterrestrial life and technology. Goode describes the goal as a “full disclosure event’ involving massive document dumps on a scale that overwhelms the corporate run media’s ability to spin and limit disclosure efforts to protect elite individuals being exposed for crimes against humanity. Goode appeals to other whistleblowers to come forward, as he has, to reveal their knowledge of secret space programs.

From June 5-9, Goode attended a series of three meetings between different factions and alliances concerning how much to disclose about the truth of extraterrestrial visitors and secret space programs using advanced technologies. During his June 9 meeting with human elites he describes as the “Committee of 200” and others, an offer was made for a “controlled disclosure”:

They stated that they had been forced through generations of mind control and threats to do all of the things that they had done. They further stated that they would prefer to work with the Alliances in setting up a new financial system that was fair to all of humanity and to begin a controlled disclosure that would not expose certain crimes and incidents that would incriminate them in their life time…. Taking all of that in consideration they proposed that a plan be agreed on that allowed the release of certain information and technologies while withholding the majority of information for a 50 year time period.

This “controlled disclosure” offer has led to concerns and questions about the kind of disclosure that is being planned by the “Secret Space Program Alliance” that Goode is working with. In his June 15 response to one of these questions, he explained the goal:

A full disclosure event would consist of a major data dump on the Internet with many hundreds of thousands of document, audio and video files on multiple mirrored sites for everyone to have access to. There would be a collapse of the corporate media machine and a 24/7 television and radio education campaign would be initiated .Not all channels and stations would be co-opted so people are not overwhelmed and could “tune out” as they needed to due to the stress.

He then explains what a “partial” or “controlled disclosure” event, such as the November 2015 offer by the Committee of 200, would entail:

If a person or group go public and reveal the existence of ET visitation and some advanced technologies, but not technologies that would collapse a “New Financial System” or reveal the crimes against humanity that have been perpetrated by the “Human Elite” and certain “Off World” or “Ancient Break Away Groups” then you have not been told the whole truth.

That would be a partial disclosure where the narrative has been controlled by a group preserving their power and avoiding the release of their crimes. The majority of the world would be shocked by this information alone and it would occupy their imaginations for some time. Very few of us at the current moment would realize that this was just another deception.

Goode then went on to appeal to other whistleblowers to come forward:

That is why some of us are disclosing what we are now so that other whistle blowers will come forward when they see it is safe to do so.

If you have first-hand knowledge of a secret space program, Corey Goode makes the following request:

If you are thinking of coming forward with information and become an anonymous or open whistle blower please Contact Myself, David Wilcock or Michael Salla to make sure you will be handled in an ETHICAL and secure manner.

Michael E. Salla, Ph.D.

No Restriction for Free Internet Distribution

[Update 6/16/15: In an earlier version of this article I referred to a question Corey Goode responded to on his FAQ page (Q82) about the fate of ‘Chad Johnson’, a pseudonym for an alleged Mars astronaut who claims he was part of a “team of 3 astronauts that went to Mars on a privately funded secret mission,” and further claimed “2 are now dead, they’re killing us to preserve the secret.” ‘Johnson’ conducted a Twitter Interview with Morgan Kochel in Feb 2012 that raises troubling questions about the accuracy of his claims. I have attempted to contact Morgan Kochel and Johnson seeking answers to these questions. The above article has been revised with the removal of Johnson’s claims until satisfactory responses to the questions are received] [Update 6/17/15: Further research and analysis of Chad Johnson’s claims have led to a new article titled: Mission to Mars: Disinformation to Hide Secret Mining of Red Planet]

FURTHER READING

Comments

comments

Tags: , , ,

Comments (2)

  • Richard

    |

    Hi Michael,
    This comment is a general one and it may be a bit long, but to me it is the most important. It has to do with credibility and evidence. I consider exopolitics.org, along with many other web sites (and associated conferences and organizations) dealing with the topic of extraterrestrial presence on earth and the control of human society by a global elite, part of a kind of community. I will call it the “disclosure community”. In this community, there is dialogue and exchange of information and ideas. Much of this information (it might be more accurate to call them “claims”) is of an extraordinary even fantastical nature. Credibility is strained to the breaking point. Some of the claims I just cannot take seriously. An example would be the claim on a number of web sites that the science of climate change as put forward by the International Panel on Climate change is part of a Cabalist strategy to provide a rationale for depopulating the world. It is argued that climate change is just a hoax. Since I have spent a fair amount of time considering the issue of climate change, and I find the evidence strongly persuasive that it is happening, I find the arguments that climate change is a hoax undermines for me the credibility of other claims being made, such as secret space programs, breakaway civilizations, the “Event”, an upcoming financial reset, the presence of a Sphere Being Alliance or an SPP Alliance, etc. To dispute the claims of IPCC climate science, for which there is a great deal of evidence, while accepting at face value the only weakly corroborated evidence of whistleblowers (like Corey Goode and others) and even channeled information (like the Law of One account from Ra) challenges for me the credibility of the disclosure community, at least a good deal of it. I believe that there is solid evidence being offered by some researchers in the disclosure community, but it is mixed up with quite a bit of other discussion that strikes me as nonsense (I hope I am not being too strong here). Because the credibility of so many accounts in the disclosure community is so strained for me, I end up with a default position, i.e. I cannot tell what is true or not and if full disclosure happens, it happens. We will just have to wait and see. The proof will be in the pudding so to speak. In the meantime I try to be as open as I can and consider the evidence, of which I consider physical evidence to be most persuasive, and the uncorroborated testimony of whistleblowers (which I agree is not all whistleblowers) to be much weaker.
    What are your thoughts.
    Regards,
    Richard

    Reply

  • Dr Michael Salla

    |

    Hello Richard, I understand your concern. It’s important to get as much evidence as possible to confirm whistleblower accounts. Yet by the nature of classified programs, such evidence is hard to attain due to the national security system which makes it a crime for federal workers/military members to release the kind of evidence we require about the programs under investigation. So often we have to work with little more than the sincerity, consistency, commitment, integrity, etc. of the alleged whistleblower.

    That is what makes exopolitics a social science since we have to work essentially with what is going on inside people’s minds as they recall their experiences, and hope we can find evidence along the way that supports/refutes the claims to reach a final conclusion.

    In some cases, we have networks of insiders, trusted sources that help reach a conclusion of a whistleblower’s validity. In the case of Corey Goode, given everything I have learned about him, my exopolitics research, own life experiences, what independent sources have revealed, etc, he is 100!% legitimate. I believe that his testimony can help break open the secrecy wall and encourage others to come forward and evidence to be leaked. So I am giving him my full support in getting his story out into the public arena, while still looking for evidence, independent confirmation and others to come forward to discuss his claims. I hope the process is not a long one, but ultimately it is up to the collective consciousness of humanity to decide when it is ready to take the red pill.

    Aloha
    Michael Salla

    Reply

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Last Tweets