In his inauguration speech challenging the vested interests that control political life in Washington D.C., President Donald Trump spoke of a future where humanity has full access to the kind of advanced technologies allegedly used in secret space programs. Trump appeared to be hinting at the benefits official disclosure of these programs would bring to the U.S and the world, and that he was going to challenge the vested interests hiding these.
Back in December 2016, he had told presidential historian Douglas Brinkley that he planned to write a short speech himself. Later, Trump tweeted a picture of himself working on his speech alone, thereby indicating that its content would be his own creation.
It is highly likely that Trump’s speech writers would have polished his words, and added a few rhetorical flourishes to accentuate whatever points he wanted to make in the various drafts leading to the final product. Nevertheless the contents of his Inauguration Speech reveal much of what Trump really thinks about the future and hopes to achieve during his presidency.
Early in his speech, Trump was clear that Washington politics only benefited a small wealthy elite rather than the entire population:
For too long, a small group in our nation’s capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost. Washington flourished, but the people did not share in its wealth. Politicians prospered, but the jobs left and the factories closed. The establishment protected itself, but not the citizens of our country. Their victories have not been your victories. Their triumphs have not been your triumphs. And while they celebrated in our nation’s capital, there was little to celebrate for struggling families all across our land.
Trump affirmed his campaign pledge to revitalize American manufacturing industry and bringing high paying jobs back. He stated his opposition to Free Trade deals which have led to many U.S. corporations taking their manufacturing plants out of the U.S., and shipping their cheaply made foreign products back at a huge profit for a small group benefited by powerful Washington DC., lobbyists:
One by one, the factories shuttered and left our shores, with not even a thought about the millions and millions of American workers that were left behind. The wealth of our middle class has been ripped from their homes and then redistributed all across the world.
Towards the end of his speech, Trump uttered one sentence that contained his most developed vision of the future for America and its citizenry. He said:
We stand at the birth of a new millennium, ready to unlock the mysteries of space, to free the earth from the miseries of disease, and to harness the energies, industries and technologies of tomorrow.
Trump’s use of the phrase “unlock the mysteries of space” may be just a rhetorical flourish to show his determination to rejuvenate the NASA space program and to assist the growing commercial space industry. Alternatively, it is a hint that he is aware that there is much more happening in space than the public have been informed about.
His use of the word “unlock” suggests that these mysteries are kept hidden in highly classified programs, and he now holds the keys to them. In that sense, he is sending the message that as the President and Commander in Chief, he holds all the keys and intends to use them to further his vision of the future. Once again, he was signaling his intent of confronting the “small group” hidden in Washington that benefit from keeping secrets from the public.
The next phrase used by Trump in the same sentence furthermore raises the possibility that he is aware of advanced healing technologies secretly developed in classified programs.
Witnesses and whistleblowers have described advanced healing technologies used in secret space programs that can regenerate limbs and organs, and cure any disease. For example, retired Aerospace Engineer, William Tompkins, says that from 1967 to 1971 he worked at the TRW Corporation, which had developed “life extension” pharmaceutical products that can cure any disease, and physically age-regress people.
Medical researchers such as geneticist, Dr. David Sinclair, have publicly demonstrated that age-regression is not science fiction, but is scientifically feasible. He states that testing on human subjects is only a few years away, without realizing the breakthroughs achieved in classified programs going as far back as five decades.
Trump further added that he planned “to harness the energies, industries and technologies of tomorrow.” Again, was this a rhetorical flourish added by a speech writer, or was he hinting at advanced technologies used in secret space programs?
In discussing the “technologies of tomorrow” Trump appeared to be referring to more than just bringing back conventional manufacturing industries to generate new jobs. If some of the advanced technologies used in secret space programs such as antigravity and free energy were released, then this would revolutionize the automobile, aviation and energy industries. Tens of millions of jobs would be created in the U.S. alone.
Trump has promised to move quickly in achieving his campaign goals and the vision outlined in his Inauguration Speech. It appears that he has been made aware of advanced space technologies that have been kept secret from the American public, and the “small group” that benefits from this. As the newly installed Commander in Chief, he now holds the keys to unlocking these secrets, and ushering in a “new millennium” through an official disclosure process that does “Make America Great Again.”
© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice
- Will President Trump Break the Secrecy Policy on Secret Space Programs?
- Trump Victory Due to FBI Stopping False Flag Alien Invasion
- Partial Disclosure and Competing Secret Space Programs
- Agreement for Limited UFO ET Disclosure Impacts US Presidential Election
- Wikileaks Reveals USAF General involved in UFO & Secret Space Program Disclosures
The movie Snowden by Oliver Stone performs a masterful job in depicting efforts by the National Security Agency (NSA) in comprehensively gathering up electronic communications between people and organizations in the U.S. and all over the world. Stone correctly displays the routine violation of U.S. constitutional rights such practices entail, and why Edward Snowden was motivated to become a whistleblower and leak official state secrets to journalists in order to reveal what was happening.
The movie frames the core issue raised by Snowden as personal privacy being a right protected by the US Constitution, except in cases where courts grant exceptions due to criminal activities or national security. In the case of the NSA, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) had become a judicial rubber stamp for NSA spying. Snowden, however, revealed that personal privacy is routinely violated without any FISA court rulings, and with no transparency and accountability in the process used by the NSA and the intelligence community more generally.
Subsequently, journalists such as Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras have seen their careers skyrocket as a result of their coverage of Snowden’s releases, and the need to curtail state sanctioned violations of personal privacy on spurious national security grounds. In short, the NSA and intelligence community should not be allowed to spy on private citizens without solid legal justification.
This raises the question of why is the NSA and the intelligence community spying on private citizens, and violating U.S. constitutional norms in the process? What Snowden the movie suggests is that the “war on terror”, which is used to justify individual surveillance, is a mere figleaf for more long-term cyber threats posed by China and Russia, and the need to give U.S. corporations a competitive edge against international rivals.
This is where Snowden and the journalists covering his revelations fail to see the big picture emerging from deeper forces at play when it comes to NSA spying on private citizens. First, we need to separate the military intelligence community comprising the NSA, Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), etc., from civilian controlled organizations such as the Central Intelligence Agency.
While the chief purpose of the NSA, DIA and other military intelligence organizations is to conduct intelligence and counter-intelligence operations, it is the CIA which is uniquely tasked by the U.S. Congress to conduct covert operations. This is where the CIA will send its operatives into countries and organizations not merely to gather intelligence or perform counter-intelligence, but to conduct covert operations including sabotage, blackmail, coups, false flag operations, assassination, etc.
What further needs to be considered is that the CIA since its inception in 1947 under President Harry Truman, has conducted its covert operations without genuine oversight or transparency. There is literally no mechanism within the U.S. bureaucracy by which CIA covert operations can be understood, let alone accounted for. This led to Truman famously regretting his decision to enable the CIA to go beyond mere “human intelligence” gathering. He said on December 22, 1963:
I think it has become necessary to take another look at the purpose and operations of our Central Intelligence Agency — CIA . . . For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the Government. This has led to trouble and may have compounded our difficulties in several explosive areas. . . . We have grown up as a nation, respected for our free institutions and for our ability to maintain a free and open society. There is something about the way the CIA has been functioning that is casting a shadow over our historic position and I feel that we need to correct it.
Coming one month after President Kennedy’s assassination, Truman was ominously hinting at a CIA link to the national tragedy
In contrast to the CIA, military intelligence operations are conducted in conformity with the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and run according to a strict chain of command. Basically, at the apex of the NSA, and other military intelligence organizations, the officials running these agencies can be held accountable for their actions.
What further compounds the problem with CIA covert operations is who does the CIA work for? On the surface, the CIA works for the U.S. Congress and Executive Branch of Government including the U.S. President. That is largely correct when it comes to the CIA analytical division, what Truman pointed to as its “original assignment”, but what about its covert operations division which has been known over the years by a number of names, the current one being the “National Clandestine Service”?
There is abundant evidence that CIA covert operations are controlled by a “Shadow Government,” which has its own agenda, entirely separate to the “Representative Government,” periodically elected. This “Shadow Government” involves elite groups and other mysterious forces who are presently accountable to no one, and want to keep things that way.
Deceased US Senator Daniel Inouye famously said:
There exists a shadowy Government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of the national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.
When President John F. Kennedy attempted to gain access to the CIA’s most closely guarded secrets about UFOs, he was assassinated in a covert action led by the chief of CIA counterintelligence, James Jesus Angleton. My book, Kennedy’s Last Stand, documents how Angleton was following a set of directives given to him by a mysterious control group known as Majestic 12 to respond to Kennedy and any future President who might become a problem concerning control over the UFO topic.
Consequently, when it comes to answering the question, “why is the NSA spying on private citizens”, the answer is more complex than the NSA simply wanting to know about citizens’ private affairs in order to more effectively deal with global terrorism. The NSA and the military intelligence community is more interested in learning about covert CIA activities, and how this impacts U.S. national security.
This then adds a new layer of complexity to the Snowdon movie. Prior to becoming an NASA operative, Snowden was a CIA analyst who allegedly became disenchanted with its covert operations, and resigned. After resuming his work with the CIA, Snowden was transferred to the Hawaii branch of Booz Allen Hamilton, an NSA contractor, ostensibly for healthier working conditions.
This raises the questions, was Snowdon a CIA mole whose job was to expose NSA spying, or was he alternatively set up by the CIA so that he would eventually reveal the truth about the NSA data collection operations as a whistleblower?
The true goal of such a CIA covert operation then was not to reveal the NSA’s spying activities in order to protect American civil liberties, but to curtail the effectiveness of the NSA’s intelligence gathering on CIA covert operations. This was done in order to keep hidden not just CIA operatives, but the puppet masters behind the CIA covert operations whose power and influence extends to sitting U.S. Presidents. This was a lesson President Kennedy learned the hard way, and President-Elect Trump is already learning with the CIA’s covert operations to undermine his incoming administration.
In this regard, former NSA employee and investigative reporter, Wayne Madsen, said:
The CIA’s effort to deny Trump the presidency is being supported by a cavalcade of retired CIA officials, including former director Michael Hayden, former acting director Michael Morell, and former clandestine services officer Robert Baer. These and other former CIA officials would not be attacking Trump’s credentials to serve as president without a wink and a nod from current CIA director John Brennan.
If the above analysis is correct, what this suggests is that Snowden is at best an unwitting dupe manipulated by the CIA, or at worst a CIA mole whose real mission was to impact NSA intelligence gathering operations which pose a threat to CIA covert operations.
It is understandable that if the U.S. military intelligence community was aware of the full extent of CIA operations involving sabotage, blackmail, false flag events, assassination, in the U.S. and around the world, that some of these operations would be neutralized. This is especially significant when it comes to the incoming inauguration ceremony of President Trump.
On the very day and time that Trump is to be inaugurated, news has emerged that the Army General commanding the D.C. National Guard is to be relieved of duty at 12:01 pm in the midst of the inauguration ceremony.
The U.S. Army general who heads the D.C. National Guard and is an integral part of overseeing the inauguration said Friday he has been ordered removed from command effective Jan. 20, 12:01 p.m., just as Donald Trump is sworn in as president. Maj. Gen. Errol R. Schwartz’s departure will come in the midst of the presidential ceremony, classified as a national special security event — and while thousands of his troops are deployed to help protect the nation’s capital during an inauguration he has spent months helping to plan.
The Washington Post interviewed Schwartz on Friday January 13, and reported his answers to his puzzling dismissal orders from an unknown Pentagon source:
“The timing is extremely unusual,” Schwartz said in an interview Friday morning, confirming a memo announcing his ouster that was obtained by The Washington Post. During the inauguration, Schwartz would command not only the members of the D.C. guard but also an additional 5,000 unarmed troops sent in from across the country to help. He also would oversee military air support protecting the nation’s capital during the inauguration. “My troops will be on the street,” said Schwartz, who turned 65 in October. “I’ll see them off, but I won’t be able to welcome them back to the armory.” He said he would “never plan to leave a mission in the middle of a battle.”
The confusion already caused by this mysterious order received by Schwartz is a tell-tale sign of a CIA covert operation in the making.
While Snowden, Greenwald and Poitras are to be commended for their forceful advocacy of civil liberties, and unaccountable national security state encroachments upon these liberties, they fail to take into account the deeper layers of the global control system, whereby the CIA’s covert operations are ultimately directed by a Shadow Government.
The CIA’s covert operations have long been a rogue element in the U.S. national security system, one that the military intelligence community has attempted to monitor and curtail when appropriate. That is especially important with the incoming Trump administration and CIA covert actions already underway against it.
© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice
- Robert Kennedy concluded rogue CIA assassinated President Kennedy
- Will President Trump Break the Secrecy Policy on Secret Space Programs?
- Trump Victory Due to FBI Stopping False Flag Alien Invasion
- More CIA documents confirm validity of leaked Monroe JFK UFO document
- Jump Room to Mars: Did CIA Groom Obama & Basiago as future Presidents?
- CIA Sanctioned Disclosure of Time Travel & Mars Bases in 2016 Presidential Bid
Donald Trump’s win in last night’s Presidential election caught most political pundits, media networks and Clinton supporters off guard. Many firmly believed polls that predicted a decisive Hillary Clinton victory. What the pundits and networks failed to do was factor in the true purpose behind FBI Director James Comey’s puzzling intervention in the closing days of the Presidential campaign.
Undoubtedly, the most surprising event preceding the election was the October 28 letter by FBI Director Comey that Clinton was once again under federal investigation. The FBI had learned from a sexting investigation of disgraced congressman, Anthony Weiner, that one of his computers was shared with his wife, Huma Abedin, deputy chair of the Clinton campaign. It contained emails between Abedin, Clinton and others sent during her tenure as Secretary of State.
This was relevant to the FBI investigation of Clinton which had been closed earlier in July. Comey’s letter to the heads of different Congressional Committees informing them of the re-opening, rocked the Clinton campaign and led to 11 days of the worst press experienced by Clinton during the entire campaign.
Then on November 6, only two days before the election, Comey once again called off the investigation, and lifted a cloud of uncertainty from the Clinton camp. Her supporters expressed a huge sigh of relief and believed the road to the White House was wide open once again.
Most were bewildered by Comey’s puzzling behavior. Why did he say anything in the first place if there was nothing sufficiently incriminating in the Weiner/Abedin emails to change the earlier July decision to close the investigation?
Clinton supporters were angry at Comey, and believed he had blatantly interfered in the election to help the Trump campaign. Republicans, including Trump himself, criticized Comey for once again protecting Clinton.
Former Clinton insider, Larry Nichols, offered another criticism of Comey that helped understand Comey’s puzzling behavior. Comey, according to Nichols, was running a psychological operation of misdirection, to help the Clinton campaign by steering the mainstream media away from the more damaging Wikileaks disclosures that were occurring.
While there is great appeal in Nichols explanation, certainly Alex Jones thought so, I don’t believe Nichols is correct.
The damaging nature of many of the Wikileaks disclosures have been succinctly described by Abby Martin in a November 5 video (see below). While the Wikileaks disclosures certainly had damaging information about Clinton’s campaign chair, John Podesta, they had little directly implicating Clinton herself. After all, Clinton could simply sack Podesta if she needed to do damage control in the closing days of her Presidential campaign.
Understanding the real purpose behind Comey’s bizarre behavior requires analysis of a document leaked by Anonymous on October 18, which contained internal polling data by the Benenson Strategy Group conducted for the Clinton campaign. The document contained sensitive internal polls showing that the Clinton campaign was in deep trouble, and heading towards inevitable defeat.
The Benenson strategy document correctly predicted that Trump supporters would turn out in droves, and laid bare the fact that Clinton had only soft support among the American population. The document further pointed out that the public was aware that crowds had to be manufactured for Clinton’s poorly attended campaign events.
The Benenson document recommended a number of salvage options designed to stop Trump supporters heading to the polls, and/or creating a national security crisis. The document began with a “non-recommended list” which contained a number of very alarming false flag scenarios involving a “Red Dawn” foreign invasion, a “Cobalt Rain” radiological attack, civil unrest, ZIKA virus, etc.
The recommended salvage option was “FIRESIGN” which uses advanced holographic technology to create a religious “awe effect.” The plan was to use the FIRESIGN technology to create the illusion of an extraterrestrial invasion which would allow the creation of an emergency situation that would lead to cancelation of the Presidential election. President Obama would subsequently hand power directly over to Clinton once the alien invasion was put to a stop through the intervention of a secret space program run by the USAF.
Significantly, some of the Wikileaks emails contained information about two USAF Generals and the head of Lockheed Martin’s Skunk works sharing information about this classified USAF program with the Clinton campaign through her campaign chair John Podesta.
In fact a meeting was held on January 25, 2016 revealing the existence of advanced technologies belonging to this USAF space program. This may be where the required information for staging a fake extraterrestrial invasion was acquired by the Clinton campaign, and passed on to the Benenson Strategy Group for developing a number of salvage strategies.
To date, the Benenson document has not been debunked, even though there are some anomalies found that raise questions over its legitimacy.
The success of the Trump campaign tells us that the projections in the document were correct after all. This suggests that the Benenson document contained factually accurate information including plans for false flag attacks.
So why did the false flag extraterrestrial invasion recommended by the Benenson document not go ahead in order to salvage the Clinton campaign? That’s where Comey’s October 28 announcement of the FBI reopening the investigation into Clinton becomes relevant.
Comey was sending the Clinton campaign a clear message – no dirty tricks for the election. Comey’s letter was the proverbial shot across the bow of the Clinton campaign. No false flag event would be permitted. The FBI was going to use its very powerful resources to ensure a clean U.S. election.
The subsequent November 6 decision by Comey to once again close the investigation into the Clinton emails was likely due to an agreement being reached behind the scenes. The November 8 election would move forward without any manufactured national security crisis.
Consequently, Comey’s intervention into the Presidential campaign put an end to plans for a false flag extraterrestrial invasion, and has led to a highly significant transfer of power to a political outsider, reviled by the political establishment of both major parties. On January 20, 2017, President-elect Trump will gain the power to fully disclose the truth about classified projects involving secret space programs and extraterrestrial life.
© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice
- Leaked Document Recommends False Flag Alien Invasion to save Clinton Campaign
- Agreement for Limited UFO ET Disclosure Impacts US Presidential Election
- Is Alien UFO false flag event on the way?
- Infowars vs Veterans Today: exopolitics & alien false flag invasion
- Will Hillary make UFO files a Presidential campaign issue?
- Hillary Emails Discuss Top Secret Special Access Programs – the link to UFOs & 2016 Presidential Election
- Obama counsel admits to failed effort to declassify UFO files
- Obama White House denied access to UFO files
Under President Vladimir Putin, Russia has witnessed a remarkable rise back to becoming a first rate military power capable of challenging U.S. hegemony around the world. More importantly, Russia is a key element of a global alliance (BRICS) in challenging plans for a New World Order contrived by banking elites that form an “Invisible Government”.
This Phoenix-like resurgence of Russia has led to competing narratives about it being either a hope for a better planetary future, or conversely an illusory opposition to U.S. hegemony as part of a contrived power dialectic controlled by the Invisible Government. This has led to competing camps who either champion Russia’s policies at a global level, or criticize them as being little more than controlled opposition to the Invisible Government.
Helping chart a reasonable path through the competing narratives about Russia is a very well thought out article by Dr. Moti Nissani titled “The Russian Phoenix: Hope or Illusion?” Published on February 3, 2016, Nissani examines many of Russia’s ambivalent approaches to helping its citizens, global debt bondage, mass media, the environment, etc.
What Nissani doesn’t do, however, is consider the exopolitical element behind the Invisible Government. In short, exopolitics is the study of extraterrestrial life and its political implications. If extraterrestrials secretly influence governments, as many researchers and whistleblowers claim, then a study of Russia’s opposition to the Invisible Government needs to consider this possibility.
Nissani starts his article with an anecdote of widespread perceptions about Russia by many around the world and numerous analysts:
When I visit a barbershop in Beirut or Amman, and am asked ‘where are you from?’ (It used to be a painfully confusing and complex question to answer, just a few years ago), I now simply reply: “Russia,” and people come and hug me and say, ‘Thank you.’
It is not because Russia is perfect. It is not perfect–as no country on Earth could or should be. But it is because it is standing once more against the Empire, and the Empire has brought so many horrors, so much humiliation, to so many people; to billions of people around the world . . . and to them, to so many of them, anyone who is standing against the Empire, is a hero. This I heard recently, first hand, from people in Eritrea, China, Russia, Palestine, Ecuador, Cuba, Venezuela, and South Africa, to name just a few places.
Nissani contrasts this positive narrative about Russia with another narrative of it being “controlled opposition” to a New World Order, which essentially offers an illusory or false choice. He quotes author Brandon Smith who writes about the false choice between Democratic and Republican parties in the U.S., and how this equally applies to the world arena:
What truly disturbs me is that our movement can be so awake and aware of the false left/right paradigm while remaining astonishingly naïve and short sighted when it comes to the false East/West paradigm. There are no “sides” in any modern conflict, only proxies fighting on a global chessboard controlled by the same elitist interests…. War is meant to forcefully change the “inertia” of civilization, and thus, forcefully change the direction of civilization in a manner that benefits the engineers of the conflict….”
After examining a number of Russian policies that provide fodder for proponents of either narrative, Nissani offers a way out of the dilemma over the correct approach to Russia and its ambivalent policies.
He identifies Russia’s timidity and caution in providing a full throated challenge to the “Invisible Government” that controls the U.S. and the world. He offers 11 explanations for this timidity, the second of which he appears to find most persuasive:
2. A second, more convincing explanation for Russian puzzling timidity is again offered by the Saker:
“I am sure that Putin fully realizes that, at least potentially, his policy of resistance, sovereignization and liberation can lead to an intercontinental nuclear war and that Russia is currently still weaker than the AngloZionist Empire. Just as in the times of Stolypin, Russia desperately needs a few more years of peace to develop herself and fully stand up.”
This leads to Nissani completing his article by raising two questions over how to respond to Russia:
The first question is: Should we—humanitarians or revolutionaries—sympathize with Russia in its current half-hearted struggle with the Invisible Government? …
The second question is: Should we dedicate our meager resources exclusively to our own revolutionary program, or should we also divert some resources to Russia’s dubious struggle for building an alternative to the Invisible Government?
He concludes with his final answer to the question of whether Russia presents hope or illusion for the rest of humanity:
To sum up my own appraisal. Progressives and revolutionaries of every nation on earth ought to sympathize with the Russian government’s struggle against the bankers. However, they cannot realistically expect that government to do their work for them. When it comes to the crucial struggle for survival, freedom, peace, and justice, they are on their own.
Nissani’s article is impressive in its even handed coverage of issues related to Russia’s half-hearted opposition to the Invisible Government. There is, however, a glaring deficiency which is critical for understanding Putin and Russia’s apparent timidity here.
If the “Invisible Government” comprises mere humans from elite banking families, as Nissani and most contemporary geopolitics researchers assume, then Russian timidity is truly an enigma which at best is simply a survival strategy to gain time to confront the international banking elite, or at worst “controlled opposition” at a global level designed to present an illusory choice to humanity.
If, however, the “Invisible Government” comprises entities who genetically are more extraterrestrial than human, some of whom can live centuries if not thousands of years, then Putin’s timidity becomes much more understandable.
This is where the classic books, The Gods of Eden (1993) by William Bramley, and Rule by Secrecy (2001) by Jim Marrs, become helpful in understanding Putin and Russia. Both depict extraterrestrials as having intervened in human affairs since antiquity, and being directly involved in controlling human societies through hybrid rulers that maintained extraterrestrial influenced bloodlines.
Direct historical support for Bramley and Marrs’s radical thesis comes from the Ancient Egyptian historian Manetho, who wrote about the rule of Gods (extraterrestrials) and Demigods (human-ET hybrids) before the 30 human dynasties began around 3100 BC in Ancient Egypt.
Manetho cited the extremely long lives of the Gods and the Demigods, who first openly ruled human societies, before delegating leadership responsibilities to human elites. This gave birth to the concept of the Divine Right of Kings, who either through direct bloodline and/or extraterrestrial approval, could claim that their crowns were divinely sanctioned.
Manetho’s writings therefore give the first historical reference to the “Invisible Government.” At the core of its membership are extraterrestrials and their hybrids who controlled human leaders from behind the scenes, and have done so for over 5000 years!
This takes us to the modern era and the situation involving extraterrestrials and the Invisible Government. William Tompkins, a retired aerospace engineer, revealed that during World War II, he served on a covert Navy operation that deployed 29 spies in Nazi occupied Europe. The Navy spies not only learned about the secrets behind many advanced Nazi aerospace programs, but also that the Nazis had reached an agreement with a Reptilian extraterrestrial race called the Draconians.
The Nazi-Draconian alliance led to the establishment of bases in Antarctica in 1939, and after the failed Operation Highjump Navy expedition in 1947, agreements were eventually imposed upon the U.S. Military Industrial Complex. This culminated in multiple secret space programs being developed as described in the book, Insiders Reveal Secret Space Programs and Extraterrestrial Alliances.
What the testimony of Tompkins and others described in Insiders Reveal Secret Space Programs, is that the Soviet Union was left out of the loop when it came to advanced aerospace technologies acquired through secret agreements with Nazis and Reptilians. Essentially, the Invisible Government had chosen the U.S. and its NATO allies as the principal mechanism for establishing a New World Order that would in essence be a covert Fourth Reich.
Consequently, the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact allies directly opposed the agenda of the Fourth Reich/Invisible Government which ultimately prevailed and orchestrated the collapse of the Soviet Union.
The Phoenix-like re-emergence of Russia once again has led to the Russian people becoming a powerful opponent to the Invisible Government and its many global tentacles as exemplified in institutions such as NATO, European Union, Bilderberg Group, World Bank, International Monetary Fund, etc.
However, Russia has lost its former East European allies and now has NATO on its borders, threatening to expand further into former Soviet Republics such as Georgia and Ukraine. This has required Russia taking a far more cautious approach than the former Soviet Union in opposing the NATO/Fourth Reich/Invisible Government agenda.
Russia has slowly built up a new alliance of nations, the BRICS, in order to oppose the New World Order agenda in the economic sphere. Nevertheless, the Invisible Government through its many tentacles and extraterrestrial elements is a potent adversary, which is highly dangerous. In his article, Nissani refers to the threat of a nuclear armageddon if Russia directly acts to expose and/or take on the Invisible Government.
In addition to thermonuclear weapons there are even more dangerous “torsion field” weapons developed in compartmentalized programs controlled by the Invisible Government that could be deployed. According to the historian, Dr. Joseph Farrell, these torsion field weapons were first actively developed by Nazi Germany.
If extraterrestrials are indeed a key element in either the composition or conduct of an Invisible Government, then Russia’s response to the latter requires a deeper level of analysis than that provided by Nissani and conventional geopolitical analysts.
This requires that we move from analyzing geopolitics as a two dimensional game of chess with clearly identified international actors and processes impacting one another, to a three dimensional chess game involving hidden extraterrestrial and non-terrestrial elements.
An exopolitical level of analysis to geopolitics is required that adequately identifies the extraterrestrial and other non-human elements influencing the Invisible Government, and how major nations such as Russia respond to these hidden influences.
© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice
- Is Russia using weapons developed with extraterrestrial help in Syrian Civil War?
- Extraterrestrial Intervention in Ukraine
- Russian military intervention in Ukraine and exopolitics
- Russian PM not joking – extraterrestrials among us according to MIB documentary
- Resolving the Bilderberg Group Mystery – Global Banking, Nazis & Alien Alliances
- Is Russia preparing for extraterrestrial disclosure?
The above video published today on Youtube outlines how global politics needs to expand beyond the traditional scholarly focus on nation states, transnational corporations, non-state actors, international organizations, and social movements.
Global politics requires three dimensional thinking, as depicted in the fictional 3D Chess of Star Trek, in order to factor in how both advanced subterranean civilizations and extraterrestrial civilizations influence political events on Earth.
Dr. Michael Salla has held full time university positions teaching both graduate and undergraduate students key concepts in global politics. He combines his scholarly expertise in global politics with his more recent research in exopolitics, to produce a remarkable 3D understanding of global (exo)politics.
More info at: exopolitics.org
There has been an important breakthrough in the investigation of the authenticity of a photo showing a flying saucer landing on an aircraft carrier that was obtained by Navy Commander Graham Bethune (now deceased), and first publicly released in 2008 by his associate, Frank Chille. Bethunes photo was discussed in a May 4 interview on Rense radio featuring William Tompkins, and was analyzed in an exopolitics article published on May 11.
An official US Air Force photo of the flight deck of the USS Franklin D. Roosevelt from April 1975 closely matches the configuration of aircraft found in Bethunes photo. There is clear evidence that the 1975 photo was altered to produce Bethunes photo. The origin and chain of custody of Bethunes photo suggests it was part of an officially sanctioned Navy disinformation campaign around the issue of flying saucers landing on U.S. aircraft carriers.
First some background. The 1975 USAF photo was released by the U.S. Air Historical Support Office and published in the 2002 book, American Military Aviation: The Indispensible Arm. It shows a Soviet intelligence ship approaching the USS Roosevelt, which was stationed in the Mediterranean Sea at the time.
The chronology of the flying saucer landing on the aircraft carrier photo released by Bethune is given by Chille, who says he obtained a copy from Bethune around the year 2000:
Graham had told me that all his photos were hand delivered to him personally by Admiral Delmar Fahrney. I had the distinct impression that I was one of very few whom were ever shown these photos by Graham Bethune. Graham never published any of the photos he had shared with me and he never told me not to share this photo with anyone. Graham did say to me at many meetings that Admiral Fahrney was very aware of the Visitors and the craft they employed. They had ships of all sizes and description and some were enormous in size. [Email 5/13/16]
Its important to emphasize that according to Chille, the photo possessed by Bethune was given to him personally by Rear Admiral Fahrney sometime before that latters death in 1984, and then later passed on to Chille in 2000. Bethune never publicly released the photo, and passed away on October 30, 2006. Chille publicly released it for the first time in 2008 via the CNN website. Chille later passed on the photo to Major George Filer who released it in one of his Filer Reports on November 2012. Finally, it was released online by Rense for his radio interview with Tompkins on May 4, 2016.
Chilles recollection of the genealogy of Bethunes photo clearly points to the U.S. Navys involvement in its creation and/or dissemination via Admiral Fahrney.
Fahrney, retired with the rank of Rear Admiral in 1950. He was credited with being the father of naval air guided missiles:
Rear Admiral Fahrney was “the foremost Navy pioneer for the development of guided missiles. His vision of future weaponry, technical excellence and tireless advocacy formed the basis for the post-World War II Navy missile programs.” “Admiral Fahrney’s early work in guided missiles and his foresight in planning for future generations of missiles earned for him recognition by many peers as ‘the father of naval air guided missiles.'” (circa 1956).
He subsequently became a prominent member of the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP), and was prominent advocate of the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis that UFOs were interplanetary vehicles. Fahrney’s stature would have meant that whoever he forwarded the alleged photo of a flying saucer landing on an aircraft carrier would have accepted it as genuine.
However, a comparative analysis of the 1975 USAF photo and Bethunes photo leads to a surprising conclusion. Bethunes photo is an altered version of the original USAF photo. The following animated gif which was created by Keanu Bruun shows the key similarities and differences of the two photos.
The removal of the word “Roosevelt” from the F-4 Phantom on the deck of the Roosevelt is very clear evidence of photo alteration. The identical wave action in the highlighted sections of the two photos is also very suspicious, and strengthens the case for the 1975 USAF photo being the original used in creating a doctored version.
This raises questions of why was the hoax created, and why was Admiral Fahrney complicit in its dissemination? His Naval and UFO research background suggests that it would take a professional military intelligence organization, such as the Office of Naval Intelligence, to fool him into believing the hoaxed photo was genuine, and anticipate that he would eventually pass it on to others who would leak it into the public arena.
Alternatively, Fahrney and/or Bethune may have been simply following orders to leak the doctored photo into the public arena.
The painstaking work that went into producing this doctored photo sometime between 1975 and 1984, well before Photoshop and other image manipulation software became publicly available, would have required professional photo manipulation expertise. Furthermore, the senior military ranks of the Navy personnel involved suggests there would have needed to be an important national security reason behind the photos creation.
One justification is that if flying saucers were genuinely landing on aircraft carriers on a regular basis, then over the years many thousands of Naval personnel would have witnessed such occurrences, and could eventually start revealing this to the public. Fahrney may have been told by Naval Intelligence assets, for example, that a flying saucer had indeed landed on the USS Roosevelt in 1975, and that dissemination of a doctored photo was necessary on national security grounds in case the incident was ever revealed by rank and file Naval personnel.
What better way to anticipate and discredit future reports of such encounters than by releasing a doctored photo of one? The hoax could then be easily mistaken as genuine by those familiar with or having direct experience of flying saucer landing on aircraft carriers, and thereby discredit such a phenomenon.
Indeed this appears to have happened with retired aerospace engineer, William Tompkins. In a radio interview with Jeff Rense, he connected Bethunes photo to an incident described in his autobiography, Selected by Extraterrestrials, where a flying saucer piloted by Nordic extraterrestrials landed on the USS Coral Sea in the 1950s.
Rense: … the first image that comes up is a large disk-shaped craft with a couple of lights visible. Apparently [it] landed on the deck of an American aircraft carrier. Tell us about that picture, Bill. What’s the story? …
Tompkins Its one of quite a number of Nordic extraterrestrial UFOs that have landed on US Navy aircraft carriers.
Tompkins was likely confused by the realistic depiction of the flying saucer in the doctored photo, which led him to believe it was a genuine photo of one of many landing incidents.
One of the leaked Edward Snowden NSA documents confirms that the intelligence agencies of the Five Eyes nations USA, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand are involved in disseminating hoaxes involving UFO images online. The doctored flying saucer landing on the USS Roosevelt is evidence that such an officially sanctioned disinformation effort is being conducted to confuse not only the general public, but also well-meaning senior military officers and even aerospace engineers, over what is genuine or not.
In the case of Bethunes photo, it was through a collaborative effort by private researchers, who were able to identify the original USAF photo used to create the doctored version, which proved essential in bringing this to public attention. While some may be disappointed that Bethunes photo is not hard evidence of a flying saucer landing on an aircraft carrier, it is nevertheless significant that an official Navy disinformation campaign has been found that aims to anticipate and discredit such claims by the dissemination of doctored versions of genuine extraterrestrial encounters.
© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice
- US Navy Photo of Alien UFO landing on Aircraft Carrier is Genuine claims Aerospace Engineer
- Top Aerospace Designer Blows Whistle on Secret US Navy Space Battle Fleets
- US Navy Spies Learned of Nazi Alliance with Reptilian Extraterrestrials during WWII
- US Navy Spies Learned Secrets of Nazi Anti-gravity Spacecraft
- Did US Navy battle UFOs protecting Nazi Antarctic sanctuary in 1947?
- William Tompkins & US Navy Secret Space Program
A commemorative video is now circulating to promote the upcoming June 20 release of the Independence Day sequel: Resurgence. There are key elements in the video, however, which suggest a soft disclosure agenda – preparing the public for official announcements of the existence of advanced antigravity spacecraft that can defend Earth against hypothetical alien threats.
The video pays tribute to the fictional 1996 attack by extraterrestrials on Earth depicted in the original Independence Day movie. The video lauds historic global efforts by nations to unify in forming a global defense force called Earth Space Defense, whose job is to defend Earth from future attacks.
A photo from 1998 shows actual world leaders at the time, Jean Chretien (Canada), Francois Mitterrand (France), Boris Yeltsin (Russia), and Tony Blair (Britain), standing alongside the hypothetical U.S. leader, President Thomas Whitmore.
Now 20 years later, a new extraterrestrial threat is emerging, but in the meantime Earth has created fleets of antigravity space fighters, a military base on the moon, killer satellites, and many other advanced weapons based on recovered alien technologies from the 1996 attack. Earth is apparently ready to defend against a renewed alien threat.
More significant is the commemorative videos depiction of the Earth unifying in the 1990s to form a coordinated global strategy for defending against an extraterrestrial threat. Of course this is a fictionalized version of world history that never officially occurred, but did something similar to these fictional events really happen behind the scenes?
Its well known that President Ronald Reagan gave a speech at the United Nations in September 1987 calling for the world to unite in dealing with an alien threat. He said:
In our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world. And yet, I ask you, is not an alien force already among us?
Reagan then appeared to walk back his startling remarks by asking: “What could be more alien to the universal aspirations of our peoples than war and the threat of war?” Earlier and subsequent comments reveal that what he really meant by “alien force” was an extraterrestrial threat, rather than a more mundane reference to the danger of global war.
In 1995, he had asked the Soviet leader, Mikhail Gorbachev, whether he would pledge cooperation with the USA in responding to an extraterrestrial threat. In a 2009 interview, Gorbachev confirmed Reagans strange request during their 1995 Geneva Summit:
From the fireside house, President Reagan suddenly said to me, “What would you do if the United States were suddenly attacked by someone from outer space? Would you help us?”
I said, “No doubt about it.”
He said, “We too.”
Beginning in 1989, the Cold War came to a rapid end with the collapse of the Berlin Wall, and by December 1991, the Soviet Union was no more. President Yeltsin became the first President of the Russian Federation, which was now focused on rebuilding what was left of the crumbling economy of the largest republic from the former Soviet Union.
As far as the world knew, there was no link between the rapid collapse of communism in Europe, and Reagans efforts to get the world to unite in opposing an extraterrestrial threat.
However, according to secret space program whistleblower, Corey Goode, the United Nations did covertly come together to form what he has called a Global Galactic League of Nations.
In an email interview, Goode replied to a question concerning the relationship between the alleged Global Galactic League of Nations space program and the United Nations:
The beginning of this program coincides with a particular speech given to the U.N. by President Reagan that mentions how quickly we would come together if there was an alien threat.
The goal of this space alliance was to find defensive technologies that could protect the Earth against an undisclosed extraterrestrial threat.
Goode claims that interstellar space craft using antigravity technologies were built, which would seek out advanced technologies in other solar systems that could be used to defend the Earth.
He says that during his 20 year tour of duty (1987 2007) he visited a remote moon base belonging to this Galactic League of Nations that was located in another solar system. The moon base had scientists from all over the world working together to develop futuristic technologies to defend the Earth.
In the book, Insiders Reveal Secret Space Programs & Extraterrestrial Alliances, whistleblower testimonies and documents are examined which lend surprising support to Goodes remarkable information. After the books publication, another piece of evidence emerged supporting Goodes claim that key members of the United Nations were secretly negotiating a coordinated response to an extraterrestrial threat during the end of the Cold War.
In a November 21, 2015 lecture, veteran UFO researcher Dr. Steven Greer said that he had spoken with the Crown Prince of Lichtenstein, Hans-Adam, who had revealed to him a startling extraterrestrial disclosure plan being negotiated in 1989 at the United Nations. Prince Hans-Adam was participating in the high level negotiations involving Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush (who replaced Reagan on January 20, 1989), Mikhail Gorbachev (Secretary General of the USSR), along with other world leaders who were meeting with Perez de Cuellar, as the Cold War was coming to an end.
Greer said that the disclosure plan was aborted at the 11th hour on November 30, 1989, after Perez de Cuellar was involved in an abduction event where he was forcibly taken to a spacecraft and threatened by extraterrestrials. Greer explained what Prince Hans-Adam had told him:
He said what happened was that Perez de Cuellar was coming back from a 3 am late night planning session for this event when he was abducted by aliens from his motorcade in Manhattan Perez de Cuellar was taken somehow out of the motorcade onto an ET craft where he was threatened by the ETs and told: If you disclose this information, we will abduct every world leader involved, including the President of the United States.
Greer went on to say that the event was actually a staged abduction. It involved highly classified corporate programs using bioengineered Programmed Life Forms designed to look like real extraterrestrials.
Nevertheless, as far as key United Nations members were concerned, according to Prince Hans-Adam telling of the incident, the Earth was facing an alien threat that was among us, just as Reagan had warned in his 1987 speech.
Adding another level of complexity to the 1989 abduction incident involving de Cuellar, is the Linda Napolitano UFO abduction case that occurred on the same night, and was extensively researched by Budd Hopkins in the book, Witnessed.
Hopkins claimed that he was able to get directly in touch with de Cuellar who privately confirmed that he had seen the Napolitano abduction. Hopkins says that he met with de Cuellar who insisted on keeping his involvement in the incident confidential, despite Hopkins repeated efforts to persuade him to go public.
The testimony of Prince Hans-Adam, as relayed by Greer, is supported to a significant extent by the impressive evidence accumulated in the Napolitano abduction case by Hopkins. The emerging conclusion is that a secret 1989 United Nations plan for extraterrestrial disclosure was aborted due to a threat the UN Secretary General Perez de Cuellar received.
Either genuine extraterrestrial visitors conducting abductions, or aliens (PLFs) created by a cabal of transnational entities staging false flag alien abductions, did not want humanity to learn the truth about extraterrestrial visitation.
The events surrounding de Cuellers involvement in the November 1989 abduction incident confirms that major members of the United Nations were meeting at the time to coordinate a response to extraterrestrials who were perceived, genuinely or not, as a threat. Perhaps more significantly, global leaders believed – based on the abduction phenomenon – that hostile extraterrestrials were already among us.
This makes it plausible that the United Nations decided to cooperate in building an interstellar fleet in the 1990s using classified technologies developed from crashed alien vehicles. The secret U.N. Space Fleet would travel to other star systems for help in defeating an extraterrestrial threat, part of which involved alien abductions on Earth, in what might be described as an interstellar SOS.
Consequently, there is significant evidence supporting Goodes claim that the major nations of the world did come together in the 1990s to form a unified scientific exploratory space fleet which would seek out defensive technologies for the Earth. Rather than an overt alien invasion as depicted in the original 1996 Independence Day, a covert alien invasion was underway as far as world leaders were aware. The events depicted in the commemorative Independence Day video are therefore not entirely fictional.
Major world leaders did indeed come together in the 1990s to help protect the Earth from a hypothetical alien threat. This was done, however, covertly, rather than with public knowledge as depicted in Independence Day: Resurgence.
While Resurgence is likely to be another in another long line of Hollywood blockbusters depicting extraterrestrial life as an existential threat to humanity, there is an element of soft disclosure based on actual events in it as well.
Based on the preceding analysis, a remarkable conclusion emerges. The world public is being subconsciously conditioned, through fiction, to accept the reality of advanced fleets of antigravity spacecraft reverse engineered from crashed alien craft, futuristic space weapons, and a unified global space command secretly established in the 1990s under the auspices of the United Nations.
© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice
In a November 21 lecture, veteran UFO researcher Dr. Steven Greer made the startling claim that in 1989, the United Nations Secretary General, Javier Perez de Cuellar, was abducted in a false flag alien event. Greer said that the fake abduction was designed to block an initiative by leading world statesmen meeting at the United Nations to disclose the truth about extraterrestrial life and technology to the world.
In his lecture, Greer said that he had spoken with the Crown Prince of Lichtenstein, Hans-Adam, who had revealed to him the startling extraterrestrial disclosure plan being negotiated in 1989 at the United Nations. Prince Hans-Adam was participating in the high level negotiations involving Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev (Secretary General of the USSR), along with other world leaders who were meeting with Perez de Cuellar, as the Cold War was coming to an end.
Greer said that the disclosure plan was aborted at the 11th hour, after Perez de Cuellar was involved in an abduction event where he was forcibly taken to a spacecraft and threatened by extraterrestrials. Greer explained what Prince Hans-Adam had told him:
He said what happened was that Perez de Cuellar … was coming back from a 3 am late night planning session for this event when he was abducted by aliens from his motorcade in Manhattan … Perez de Cuellar was taken somehow out of the motorcade onto an ET craft where he was threatened by the ETs and told: If you disclose this information, we will abduct every world leader involved, including the President of the United States.
Greer went on to say that the event was actually a staged abduction. It involved highly classified corporate programs using bioengineered “Programmed Life Forms” (PLFs) designed to look like real extraterrestrials. He said that the PLFs, which he called “aliens” as opposed to genuine extraterrestrials, were used in many thousands of false flag abduction events to fool the world into believing we were facing an extraterrestrial threat. The PLFs would implant abductees with tracking chips so they could easily be abducted in the future by the corporations involved,
To support his startling claims, Greer supplied documents showing that he was indeed in communications with Prince Hans-Adam, and met with him in New York in July 1994. The letters show that Hans-Adam had agreed with Greer’s analysis of the role of transnational corporations in managing the UFO/extraterrestrial phenomenon, but thought Greer had little chance of success in his disclosure efforts.
Greer also supplied whistleblower testimony from William Pawelec, a former military/corporate contractor, who had disclosed that small electronic implant chips had been developed in 1979 for tracking purposes. These could be implanted into people, making them trackable even from an altitude of 120 kilometers. Pawelec said that billions of the chips were made by a division of the Siemens corporation, but they had disappeared.
Greer also supplied a document from the Strategic Studies Institute located inside the US Army War College, which detailed an elaborate psychological warfare plan to deceive the world about extraterrestrial life by staging false flag alien abductions. The plan envisaged traumatizing abducted individuals sufficiently so that they would be willing accomplices in a future false flag alien invasion scenario.
The documents and whistleblower testimonies Greer cited raise important questions about why the Siemens corporation had manufactured billions of chip implants soon after 1979, which could be used to track individuals. Pawelec testimony is especially significant since implants have been found in many abductees that proved to be electronic tracking devices them.
More recent research on implants has shown that these can be used to remotely influence individuals from satellites using advanced computer systems. A U.S. Patent issued in 2000 reveals that individuals with brain implants can have their thoughts and emotions electronically influenced by satellites remote controlled by advanced computers.
Greer’s documents and Pawelec’s testimony strongly suggest the existence of a highly classified corporate military program to monitor and remotely influence individuals with implants for psychological warfare purposes. Furthermore, one of the Edward Snowden NSA files, also confirms that UFOs were a key part of covert online operations.
Was Perez de Cuellar subjected to a false flag alien abduction for psychological warfare purposes, as Greer claims?
The crux of Greer’s version of events is that Perez de Cuellar was abducted and threatened by the ‘aliens’ (PLF’s impersonating extraterrestrials), after leaving a late night planning session for an upcoming extraterrestrial disclosure plan by the United Nations. Yet there is compelling evidence that Perez de Cuellar was not actually abducted himself, but had witnessed, along with his two bodyguards, an alien abduction of a woman around 3 am on November 30, 1989.
Budd Hopkins, a respected UFO researcher, was the first to investigate the Linda Napolitano (aka Linda Cortile) alien abduction case. Essentially, Napolitano claims that she was floated out of her 12th floor bedroom window by three aliens that appeared in a bluish-white beam of light, projected from a large glowing UFO hovering over her Manhattan apartment complex. She was then taken inside the alien craft and had various experiments conducted on her.
In early February 1991, Hopkins received a letter from two men claiming to be police officers using the first names Richard and Dan, who had seen the Napolitano abduction. Richard and Dan were acting as bodyguards for an unidentified VIP and were in a car two blocks away. They told Hopkins:
There was an oval-shaped object hovering over the top of the apartment building two or three blocks up from where we sat. We didn’t know where it came from. It happened too fast. Its lights turned from a bright reddish orange to a whitish blue coming out of the bottom. Green lights rotated round the edge of the saucer. A little girl or woman wearing a white gown sailed out of the window in a fetal position – and then stood in mid-air in this beam of light. I could see three of the ugliest creatures I ever saw. I don’t know what they were. They weren’t human. Their heads were out of proportion, very large heads with no hair. Those buggers were escorting her into the craft. My partner screamed, ‘We have got to get them.’ We tried to get out of the car but couldn’t. After the woman was escorted in, the oval turned reddish orange again and whisked off.
The third witness had seen the abduction from a ¼ mile away while traveling on the Brooklyn bridge. Up to 23 witnesses have come forward describing various aspects of abduction incidents described by Napolitano.
The VIP was later identified by the two bodyguards as Perez de Cuellar. Hopkins claimed that he was able to get directly in touch with de Cuellar who confirmed to Hopkins that he had seen the abduction. Hopkins says that he met with de Cuellar who insisted on keeping his involvement in the incident confidential, despite Hopkin’s efforts to persuade him to go public.
Hopkin’s investigation of the Napolitano incident showed that there were four direct witnesses in total, including de Cuellar, to Napolitano’s abduction.
So, there was an abduction that de Cuellar had seen, but was he directly involved as Greer was told? According to the two bodyguards, their car had stopped running during the sighting suggesting it was under the influence of the saucer shaped craft.
Also, it was later revealed that one of the bodyguards, Dan, had a lifetime of personal abduction experiences himself and was often paired with Linda Napolitano when they were children. He apparently recognized Napolitano from these childhood incidents, and became obsessive over her.
In one of her sessions with Hopkins, Napolitano revealed a startling development: “she thought somehow she was being used by the aliens to control the men. She communicated with the men telepathically.” It can be concluded that while in the flying saucer, she was telepathically communicating with Dan and/or Perez de Cuellar on behalf of the aliens.
Later, Dan and Richard revealed they were CIA agents. As these additional details emerged, some investigators then dismissed the Napolitano case as clever disinformation to discredit Hopkins’ abduction research.
Details from what Prince Hans-Adam told Greer, indicate Napolitano’s abduction had happened at roughly the same time as Perez de Cuellar was himself directly involved in an abduction incident. The most plausible explanation is that de Cuellar had seen Napolitano’s abduction, and was perhaps even telepathically influenced, rather than being abducted himself, as Greer was told.
Nevertheless, the latter possibility can’t be ruled out entirely given the abduction history of one of his personal bodyguards, and problems experienced with the car around the time the abduction was occurring.
In either case, the Napolitano abduction had a powerful emotional effect on Perez de Cuellar and his bodyguards. It is easy to understand why Perez de Cuellar may have interpreted the abduction incident as a threat not to proceed with the United Nations disclosure plan. This is even more so if de Cuellar was receiving telepathic communications from Napolitano through Dan, on behalf of the aliens. All of this parallels with key elements of what Greer was told by Prince Hans-Adam.
In addition, Greer insisted in his lecture that the incident was a staged alien abduction, rather than a genuine extraterrestrial event. According to Greer, extraterrestrials are not involved in abductions or other hostile actions. In his opinion, extraterrestrials do not conduct overt hostile actions against humanity. If hostile acts occur, this is indicative of a false flag alien event staged by rogue classified programs run by transnational corporations in cooperation with elements of military-intelligence community of the world’s major nations.
Greer’s conclusion that there are no hostile extraterrestrials interacting with humanity is very controversial, and is refuted by the testimonies of many whistleblowers and experiencers claiming the contrary. Long adhering to his position, in May 2006 Greer launched a rare public rebuke of my exopolitics research for claiming that some extraterrestrial visitors behaved in a hostile manner. My response to him at the time is here.
In the Perez de Cuellar abduction, as related to Greer, the action was overtly hostile in terms of threats being made to abduct other world leaders. Greer concludes that this is evidence of it being a false flag alien event that belongs to the ongoing psychological warfare operations against the world public.
It is plausible that the 1989 abduction was indeed designed to be a threat and warning not to proceed with the United Nations extraterrestrial disclosure plan. As for whether the Napolitano incident was a staged alien abduction or a genuine extraterrestrial event, there is considerable room for debate. It was certainly the opinion of Budd Hopkins, who has done the most work in investigating the case, that it was a genuine extraterrestrial abduction.
Yet Greer does have some compelling documentary evidence that substantiates staged alien abductions as a tool for a broader psychological warfare campaign. One of the goals of which is to condition the world populace to accept a contrived hostile alien threat.
Regardless of the debate over whether the aliens in the Napolitano abduction case were genuine or not, what Greer has done in releasing Prince Hans-Adam’s testimony in his November 21 lecture, is that it strongly confirms Hopkin’s earlier claims that Perez de Cuellar was directly involved with the Napolitano abduction event. Whether de Cuellar was merely a witness to Napolitano’s abduction, was himself abducted, and/or had received telepathic messages from the aliens, more research is required.
The testimony of Prince Hans-Adam, as relayed by Greer, is supported to a significant extent by the impressive evidence accumulated in the Napolitano abduction case. The final conclusion is astounding. A secret 1989 United Nations plan for extraterrestrial disclosure was aborted due to a threat the UN Secretary General Perez de Cuellar received. Either genuine extraterrestrial visitors conducting abductions, or aliens (PLFs) created by a cabal of transnational entities staging false flag alien abductions, did not want humanity to learn the truth about extraterrestrial visitation.
© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice
- Vatican linked to United Nations video on integrating extraterrestrial life
- Secret United Nations Space Program Preparing for Alien Invasion
- Obama admits space aliens control USA: Was he joking?
- Reagan Speech about Alien Threat linked to Secret UN Interstellar Space Fleet
- Are Aliens Guarding President Obama
On October 14, Dr. Preston James, a columnist with Veterans Today, made startling claims about Russia using advanced weapons system developed through a secret agreement with extraterrestrial visitors in an article titled, “Putin’s Wild Card in Syria.”
James’ article analyses the game-changing nature of Putin’s military intervention in Syria, and the nature of the extraterrestrial inspired weapons systems used to devastating effect:
What exactly do the Russians now have as far as ultra high-tech weaponry? The list is long, but includes supersonic torpedoes, which create their own ability to travel through matter surrounding their path using inter-dimensional cloaking. Russia has missiles which, after launch, operate as if they are “hived” and use inter-dimensional entangled communication to evade interception, to regroup and to re-target, taking strange flight patterns which can change from straight to spirals to semi circles and more. Some insiders believe that the Russians now have the ability to generate inter-dimensional cloaking of some of their stealth aircraft and missiles, making them for the most part undetectable in flight and even shut-off spy satellites.
James’ analysis has some remarkable similarities to the claims of Corey Goode, whose whistleblower testimony concerning multiple secret space programs has been the focus of a recently published book, and an online television series.
James begins “Putin’s Wild Card in Syria” by distinguishing the sources he used from those making up the military intelligence community associated with Veterans Today:
Even though some of the Veterans Today Directors may have Beyond-black Secret Space War clearances, none of the Secret Space War material in this article was sourced by them or through them and comes from independent outside sources.
James does not name his outside sources, but they do not include Corey Goode, whose information differs in key ways. Yet when it comes to Putin’s role in dealing with an elite control group manipulating humanity and suppressing information about advanced technologies and extraterrestrial visitors, James’ and Goode’s information align closely. This is either a remarkable coincidence, or important corroboration that Putin has indeed reached agreements with extraterrestrial visitors, which have supplied advanced weapons technologies to the Russians.
James describes the elite control group and its influence in the Syrian Civil War as follows:
It is now clear to the whole world that ISIS, ISIL, Daesh, Al Qaeda and Al Nusra and the like are little more than paid mercenaries of the Israeli-American Terror Machine, and are synthetically-created, engineered and deployed Gladio-style terror, all done to further the NWO Globalist Agenda of the Rothschild Khazarian Mafia (*RKM).
According to James, the RKM is associated with a nefarious group of extraterrestrials called the “Dracos” or the “Draconians”:
The best information available suggests that the RKM is basically directed and energized by the Dracos, an incredibly evil race of cosmic predators that are large and powerful human inter-dimensional cosmic parasites that love to control, murder, torture and consume human flesh.
Goode similarly refers to the Draconians as secretly directing Earth’s elite control group, which he describes as the “Satanic/Luciferian Cabal.” Goode says that he and another whistleblower using the pseudonym, Lt. Col. Gonzales, have attended meetings with the Draconians organized by a positive group of military insiders called the “Secret Space Program Alliance”.
James refers to a Russian agreement with a positive group of extraterrestrials opposed to the Draconians and the Cabal/RKM:
Sources deep within Russia have reported that the Russian Federation has signed a treaty with a certain Alien ET group, and this particular Alien ET group has a long conflict with the a certain group that has allegedly been “advising and running” the top RKM Policy-makers who have served as their agent for taking over the whole world.
James goes on to say that the Russians have been given advanced weapons technologies by the positive extraterrestrial group that neutralize the best technologies available to the CIA/Mossad/Saudi equipped Islamic State groups backed by the Cabal/RKM:
At this time it is unknown what their long term agenda is, but so far they have equipped the Russian Federation with some astoundingly powerful weapons, especially ultra-high tech electronics which can temporarily shut off the electrical systems of whole ships or carriers and even aircraft and all group, air and satellite radar systems. Putin has allegedly been told that he should go ahead and checkmate the RKM and its Terrorists cutouts in Syria and Iran and not worry, because this Alien ET group now has his back.
James refers to an incident involving the U.S.S. Donald Cook as an example of these advanced extraterrestrial technologies being developed and used by the Russian military:
Some of Putin’s secret space war weapons are shocking in their actual capabilities. One was tested on an America ship, the USS Donald Cook, last April 2014. As two Russian fighters flew over, the ship’s electric supply was disrupted, shutting down all radar and Aegis defense systems. It was reported that the top officers were so upset that some of them resigned their commissions and left the Navy, feeling they could not even defend their own ships and crews anymore against such ultra high-tech weapons.
James information dovetails with Goode’s own revelations of Putin’s association with an “Earth Based Alliance” associated with the BRICS nations, which is dedicated to overturning the plans of the Illuminati/Cabal/RKM.
Goode describes Putin’s role as follows:
Putin and other elements of the “Earth Based Alliance” that make up the BRICS Alliance among others that dove tail together are all working for the common goal of defeating the “Satanic/Luciferian Cabal” that is now in control of the majority of the world and responsible for not only amazing deceptions of his and other countries populations but also some of the most horrific Crimes Against Humanity that have ever taken place in known history. There are many of these crimes that have become more and more known through recent disclosures behind the scenes. This has only caused these groups and people to want to bring down these Secret Earth Government Syndicates now more than ever.
Goode has said that during Putin’s ten day disappearance from March 6 to March 16, 2015, he or his representatives very likely attended a secret space program meeting held on the Moon where the use of advanced extraterrestrial technologies for defensive purposes was discussed:
The timing of his 10 day disappearance occurred exactly during the time of the SSP Alliance/Sphere Alliance Conference that was taking place on the LOC [Lunar Operations Command – a secret moonbase] along with many Earth Politicians (Non Cabal) and Regular Earth Citizens. I did not personally see him or have I been briefed that he was there. I was not involved in that portion of the conference. I do strongly suspect that he or his representatives were present.
Regarding the Donald Cook incident, Goode replied to the following question:
Q7. On April 12, 2014, the USS Donald Cook equipped with an Aegis Combat System was allegedly disabled by a Russian Su-24 tactical bomber deploying a sophisticated electronic jamming system. Was this an example of the kind of technological assistance given to Solar Warden and its earth allies to change the military/political balance of power on Earth?
[Goode] I have been told this is the case by several SSP Alliance members, but I have not seen any briefing reports personally to be able to vouch for that 100% myself. Other insiders have reported this as well so it is probably a safe speculation.
There is compelling circumstantial evidence supporting both James’ and Goode’s remarkable claims. Currently, all U.S. aircraft carriers have been removed from the Persian Gulf according to a CNN Report. According to James, this is because U.S. aircraft carriers currently have no effective defense against Russia’s superweapons:
The last US Carrier group in the Mideast was called home, and this alone has confused many who thought the American nuclear carriers and their state-of-the-art Aegis missile defense shield were invincible and should stay put in order to stop ISIS…. . Some top weapons experts consider these carriers sitting ducks because of all the new Russian ultra high-tech weaponry recently deployed, which can temporarily deactivate their electrical supply systems and electronics, including their radar and sonar systems as well as their Aegis missile systems.
James concludes his article by claiming:
What few realize is that President Putin and the Russian Federation have now been “authorized” to checkmate the RKM in Syria and Iran and take it down if they don’t start backing down. Putin is also well aware that the RKM has infiltrated and hijacked much of the Pentagon and the US Administration, as well as NATO.
Preston James’ “Putin’s Wild Card in Syria,” contains incredible claims which lack the necessary corroborating hard evidence that many will demand to take it seriously. Yet his claims have remarkable similarities to those of another independent whistleblower, Corey Goode who has been rigorously investigated by several researchers and found to be very credible. Furthermore, the 2014 Donald Cook incident and the puzzling disappearance of all U.S. aircraft carriers from the Persian Gulf does lend support to James’ incredible claims.
If James and Goode are correct, then Russia’s military intervention in Syria using advanced technologies developed with extraterrestrial help is a game-changer. As James claims, it will checkmate the attempt by nihilistic forces (Cabal/RKM) to use Syria as a means of spreading discord and violence throughout the Middle East and beyond, and bring about a fulfillment of Biblical End Times prophesy.
Cabal/RKM control of the planet appears to be coming to an end with Putin’s bold intervention. If so, not only will Russia put an end to nefarious plans to bring about a fulfillment of a devastating End Times World War, but also vindicate famed American prophet Edgar Cayce who in 1935 predicted that Russia would, after the collapse of communism, become the “hope of the world.”
© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice
- Extraterrestrial alliance helps secret space program overcome opposition to full disclosure
- Extraterrestrial Intervention in Ukraine
- Russian military intervention in Ukraine and exopolitics
- Russian PM not joking – extraterrestrials among us according to MIB documentary
- Is Russia preparing for extraterrestrial disclosure?
- Infowars vs Veterans Today: exopolitics & alien false flag invasion
An ancient network of underground cities, tens of thousands of years old, has exerted a powerful influence over human society and religion for millennia according to secret space program whistleblower, Corey Goode. More recently, he claims this network of cities has been negotiating with major nations that have developed secret space programs.
On September 23, Goode released a report describing a diplomatic meeting with members of seven ancient underground civilizations that recently had to come together to form an alliance due to political and technological changes on the Earth’s surface. In the latest episode of Cosmic Disclosure on GaiamTV, Goode reveals his knowledge of these underground civilizations that are described as the “Agartha Network” – a coalition of underground cities described in “smart glass pads” he had access to during his secret space program service from 1987-2007.
Goode says that the Agartha Network was created over time by successive cataclysms on the Earth’s surface that led to different civilizations establishing underground refuges for their elites, along with their most advanced technologies. As the number of ancient underground cities expanded over the ages, many joined to form the Agartha Network, which possessed advanced spacecraft called the “Silver Fleet”.
The Agartha Network and the other breakaway ancient civilizations were not alone in establishing refuges in underground locations throughout Earth’s turbulent surface history. Non-human races that include ‘Raptors’ (a hybrid Reptilian and Avian race), were also present, and played significant roles in Earth’s cataclysmic history.
Also, a war-like Reptilian race called the ‘Draconians’ first appeared around 300,000 years ago according to Goode, and began genetic experiments with some the surface inhabitants that survived earlier cataclysms. Other human-like extraterrestrials also began genetic experiments – a total of 22 – with the remnants of surface humanity.
The Draco and the human extraterrestrial visitors had major wars in which the fortunes of one side or the other would wax and wane over the ages. Goode said that Zecharia Sitchin’s The Earth Chronicles, is a fairly accurate account of these battles. Meanwhile, the Agartha Network closely monitored conditions on the Earth’s surface, and the different extraterrestrial visitors conducting genetic experiments, while fighting amongst each other.
Goode says that the Agartha Network pretended to be gods when they met members of surface humanity, thereby either giving birth to, or, at the very least, influencing ancient pagan religions. Among the Greek ‘gods’, and similar gods from other religious traditions, many were actually members of the Agartha Network.
In Goode’s September 23 report, the Agarthans and other underground civilizations claimed that they did so in order to bring a measure of order and civilization to a turbulent surface humanity, which had been genetically modified by Draconians and other extraterrestrial visitors to be aggressive.
Goode said that it was not only the Agartha Network that pretended to be gods to surface humanity, but also some visiting extraterrestrials who did likewise. These included bird-like extraterrestrials revered by the ancient Egyptians such as Thoth and Horus. According to the “Law of One” material, the RA group says that despite their efforts to be merely teachers to the ancient Egyptians, they were instead revered as gods.
Goode’s claims are supported by ancient historians like Manetho (circa 300 BC), who describes pre-dynastic Egypt as being directly ruled by the gods, who walked among surface humans for millennia. These ‘gods’ intermarried with humanity to produce generations of demi-gods who ruled over humanity for extended periods. A similar scenario is described in the Book of Enoch.
In an interview on Coast to Coast AM on September 14/15, Goode said that the gods (Agarthans and visiting extraterrestrials) walked the Earth’s surface until around the fourth century AD. This approximate date coincides well with the gradual disappearance of the pagan religions and the ascendance of Christianity after the conversion of the Roman Emperor Constantine in 325 AD.
Around 600 AD, Islam was established and rapidly spread throughout the Middle East, North Africa and Asia. The ancient pagan traditions rapidly disappeared as the two major monotheistic faiths spread around the world, often at the point of a sword.
Significantly, both of these monotheistic faiths incorporated significant elements of the Jewish religion (‘Old Testament’ in Christianity) that referred to an unknown transcendent ‘God’ called Yahweh or Jehovah. The Old Testament has numerous references to this alleged transcendent God commanding the ancient Hebrews to ruthlessly eradicate the indigenous pagan peoples in what would today be recognized as ethnic cleansing. This suggests that the Hebrew ‘God’ was more likely another advanced extraterrestrial or subterranean imposter.
If Goode is correct, the Agartha Network’s influence over surface humanity, through ancient pagan beliefs, significantly waned with the spread of Christianity and Islam that incorporated the Hebrew belief in an unknown transcendent God. Were these two monotheistic faiths genuinely a result of divine intervention by a transcendent being, or were they likewise influenced by one or more different extraterrestrial civilizations impersonating a transcendent being?
In the modern era, Goode claims that the Agarthans attempted to assert their influence over surface humanity by this time pretending to be extraterrestrials from other worlds. They apparently did so with German Secret Societies, which along with Nazi SS, developed flying saucer technologies in the World War II era.
The Agartha Network negotiated and established treaties with German Secret Societies, accepting some of their members into their underground cities, while giving assistance to others in establishing underground bases in Antarctica and South America, according to Goode.
The Germans shared a similar Nordic genetics with some members of the Agartha network that they came into contact with in Antarctica and South America. Yet, not all ancient underground civilizations share these racial characteristics as Goode made clear in his September 23 report, which he illustrated with several pictures released on October 7.
Goode says that the Agartha Network pretended to be extraterrestrials with the U.S. based secret space program, until they were exposed in the 1970’s. More recently, there have been negotiations conducted between the Secret Space Programs and the Agartha Network, as Goode revealed in his September 23 report.
If Goode’s account of what he read in classified briefing documents in secret space programs is accurate, then his account of the Agartha Network and its history raises many important issues. On the one hand, the Agartha Network and other ancient breakaway civilizations have clearly influenced surface humanity by pretending to be gods, and more recently extraterrestrials.
On the other hand, the Agartha Network represents a repository of ancient knowledge and history that to some extent predates the intervention of extraterrestrials on the Earth’s surface. Therefore they can help surface humanity learn much about its origins and potential, despite the bewildering assortment of changes introduced by so many extraterrestrial visitors through long-term genetic experiments.
While critics claim that there is no hard evidence supporting Goode’s testimony, there is in fact documentary evidence supporting some of his key claims, which is detailed in the book, Insiders Reveal Secret Space Programs and Extraterrestrial Alliances. In addition, Goode’s sincerity, consistency in his claims, along with compelling circumstantial evidence, all point to his disclosures being genuine rather than contrived.
Goode’s latest Cosmic Disclosure interview, together with his September 23 report, outlines a version of history that needs to be seriously considered by all seeking to find the truth about humanity’s origins, and its interactions with ancient civilizations and extraterrestrial visitors. If negotiations are currently being conducted with the Agartha Network, as Goode claims, then we may not have to wait too long for future disclosures that turn human history on its head, and reveal many uncomfortable truths about our origins and major religions.
© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice
- Secret Space Program Alliance Negotiates with Council of Ancient Earth Civilizations
- Uncensored History Revealed with Secret Space Program Disclosures
- Second Eyewitness Report of Secret Space Meetings discussing Alien Disclosure
- Global elites offer to begin limited disclosure of extraterrestrial life & technology in Nov 2015
- Full ET disclosure plan involves document dumps & whistleblowers coming forward
- Ancient space programs & human-extraterrestrial alliance meetings
- Shop & Resources